Supreme Court rules unanimously in favor of straight Ohio woman who claimed discrimination

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously successful favour of an Ohio pistillate who claimed she was discriminated against for occupation promotions successful favour of cheery candidates connected Thursday.

The ruling, Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, finds that members of bulk groups successful protected classes bash not request to conscionable a higher modular of grounds successful bid to found discrimination. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the sentiment of the tribunal successful the 9-0 decision.

"The Sixth Circuit has implemented a regularisation that requires definite Title VII plaintiffs—those who are members of bulk groups—to fulfill a heightened evidentiary standard," Jackson wrote. "We reason that Title VII does not enforce specified a heightened modular connected bulk radical plaintiffs. Therefore, the judgement beneath is vacated."

The pistillate successful the case, Marlean Ames, is simply a heterosexual pistillate who had worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services since 2004. She argued she was discriminated against connected the ground of her intersexual predisposition aft she was passed implicit for a promotion successful 2019 successful favour of a lesbian woman, and was past aboriginal replaced successful her ain relation by a cheery man.

SCOTUS TO HEAR STRAIGHT WOMAN'S DISCRIMINATION CASE THAT COULD RESHAPE EMPLOYMENT LAW

The Supreme Court voted 9-0 connected Thursday successful favour of an Ohio pistillate who claimed she was discriminated against for being heterosexual. (AP/Jon Elswick)

"Ames was qualified, had been denied a promotion successful favour of a cheery candidate, and was aboriginal demoted successful favour of different cheery candidate—evidence that would ordinarily fulfill her prima facie burden—before it specifically faulted Ames for failing to marque the ‘requisite showing of "background circumstances."'"

Title VII prohibits employers from discriminating against employees connected the ground of race, color, religion, sex, oregon nationalist origin. Thursday's ruling strikes down the Sixth Circuit Court's "background circumstances" rule, which had required bulk groups successful protected classes to amusement peculiar grounds of discrimination.

Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the sentiment of the tribunal for the lawsuit of Marlean Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File )

Thursday's bid does not afloat resoluteness the lawsuit successful Ames' favor, however. The tribunal notes that Ohio had "alternative arguments" for wherefore the Ohio government's attraction of Ames was justified. The justices said they are not weighing successful connected those alternate arguments, simply striking down the "background circumstances" rule.

"We granted reappraisal to see the validity of the "background circumstances" rule, and we cull that regularisation for the reasons acceptable distant above. We permission it to the courts beneath to code immoderate of Ohio’s remaining arguments connected remand," Jackson wrote.

United States Supreme Court (front row, near to right) Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan, (back row, near to right) Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Ames' lawsuit was supported by the Justice Department, the American First Legal Foundation and the libertarian Pacific Legal Foundation. The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund was among the large groups backing Ohio successful the case.

READ THE FULL COURT OPINION BELOW (APP USERS CLICK HERE)