4 days ago
4
The Supreme Court is declining to perceive a situation to authorities bans connected battle weapons, semi-automatic rifles that are fashionable among weapon owners and person besides been utilized successful aggregate wide shootings
ByLINDSAY WHITEHURST Associated Press
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court declined connected Monday to perceive a situation to a authorities prohibition connected battle weapons, semiautomatic rifles that are fashionable among weapon owners and person besides been utilized successful aggregate wide shootings.
The justices turned down a lawsuit against a Maryland instrumentality passed aft the 2012 shooting astatine Sandy Hook Elementary School successful Connecticut that killed 20 children and six adults. The shooter was equipped with an AR-15, 1 of the firearms commonly referred to arsenic an battle weapon.
Three blimpish justices, however, publically noted that they would person taken the case, and a 4th said helium is skeptical that specified bans are constitutional, indicating the tribunal could soon instrumentality different look astatine the issue.
Several states person akin measures, and Congressional Democrats person besides supported the concept. The challengers had argued that radical person a law close to ain the firearms similar the AR-15.
The lawsuit comes 2 years aft the precocious tribunal handed down a landmark ruling that expanded Second Amendment rights and spawned challenges to firearm laws astir the country.
Ten states and the District of Columbia person akin laws, covering large cities similar New York and Los Angeles. Congress allowed a nationalist battle weapons prohibition to expire successful 2004.
___
Follow the AP's sum of the U.S. Supreme Court astatine https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
English (US) ·