Supreme Court leaves District of Columbia gun restriction on large magazines in place

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court connected Friday near successful spot a longstanding weapon regularisation successful the District of Columbia that bans magazines that clasp much than 10 rounds of ammunition, opting erstwhile again to debar taking up a caller weapon rights case.

The court, which has a 6-3 blimpish bulk that mostly favors weapon rights, turned distant a situation to the Washington, D.C., instrumentality just a fewer days aft rejecting an entreaty implicit a akin instrumentality successful Rhode Island.

Then, the tribunal besides near successful spot Maryland's prohibition connected assault-style weapons including the AR-15 semiautomatic rifle.

Follow unrecorded authorities sum here

The tribunal expanded weapon rights successful a major 2022 ruling that recovered for the archetypal clip that the close to carnivore arms nether the Constitution's Second Amendment extends extracurricular the home. But the tribunal has since frustrated weapon owners by declining to instrumentality up cases that would grow upon that ruling.

The District of Columbia has agelong been a ineligible battleground implicit weapon restrictions. The Supreme Court's landmark 2008 ruling that for the archetypal clip recovered that radical person an idiosyncratic close to carnivore arms successful aforesaid defence successful their homes arose from a situation to a D.C. law.

In the latest case, 4 weapon owners challenged the regularisation connected large-capacity magazines that was enacted successful the aftermath of the 2008 Supreme Court ruling, saying the regularisation is unlawful nether the aboriginal 2022 decision.

Both a national justice and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the law.

The appeals court, successful a 2-1 vote, said successful a ruling past twelvemonth that though large-capacity magazines are arms nether the Second Amendment and person been successful communal usage for years, they tin beryllium regulated due to the fact that they are "particularly dangerous."

Last summer, the Supreme Court sidestepped multiple gun-related disputes soon aft it issued a ruling that upheld a national instrumentality that prohibits radical taxable to home unit restraining orders from possessing firearms.

In different enactment connected pending appeals Friday, the tribunal decided against taking up a important predetermination lawsuit involving mail-in ballots successful the battleground authorities of Pennsylvania that pitted Republicans against Democrats.

The determination leaves intact a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that said voters who nonstop mail-in ballots that are flagged arsenic defective tin past record a abstracted proviso in-person ballot.

The Republican National Committee was seeking to overturn the 2024 authorities tribunal decision, portion the Democratic National Committee was defending it.